Statement of the American Psychological Association on the DSM-5 Development Process

December 2, 2011

WASHINGTON—Diagnostic classification systems of disorders and diseases are an integral part of health care delivery. Any such system, including the upcoming 5th edition of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-5) of the American Psychiatric Association and the pending revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) of the World Health Organization, must be based on the best available science and serve the public interest.

The American Psychological Association has members with significant expertise in the scientific areas relevant to the DSM, and we have urged them to take part in the DSM revision efforts. We are encouraged that many psychologists are making meaningful contributions to the process as individuals, as members of the DSM-5 Task Force and work groups, and through the divisions of the American Psychological Association. This involvement includes offering comments on draft provisions and participating in field trials.

We applaud the Society for Humanistic Psychology (Division 32 of our association) for its leadership role in generating dialogue and information-sharing within the broader mental health community concerning the revisions process. The Society also has prepared, disseminated, and garnered wide support for an “open letter” to the DSM-5 Task Force and the American Psychiatric Association, which expresses specific concerns related to the DSM-5 development process.

We share their belief that the purpose of any diagnostic classification system should be to improve treatment outcomes. Thus it is essential to consider the impact of any new diagnostic system or category on vulnerable individuals, groups and populations, particularly children, older adults, and ethnic minorities. By appropriately identifying individuals in need of treatment, it is possible to both safeguard the welfare of individuals and to direct treatment resources where they are most needed. Concerns also have been raised that over-identification or misidentification of individuals as being in need of treatment could lead to the use of unnecessary and potentially harmful interventions.

The American Psychological Association recognizes that there is a diversity of opinion concerning the ongoing DSM-5 development process. Our association has not adopted an official position on the proposed revision; rather, we have called upon the DSM-5 Task Force to adhere to an open, transparent process based on the best available science and in the best interest of the public. In this regard, we appreciate the Task Force’s expressed commitment to seriously consider the issues and concerns raised by experts in the mental health field in their deliberations.

We call upon our members (either as individuals or groups) to continue to add their perspectives to enhance the validity and clinical utility of the DSM-5. The American Psychological Association will continue to monitor the revision process and be a strong voice for its transparency.

The American Psychological Association, in Washington, D.C., is the largest scientific and professional organization representing psychology in the United States and is the world’s largest association of psychologists. APA’s membership includes more than 154,000 researchers, educators, clinicians, consultants and students. Through its divisions in 54 subfields of psychology and affiliations with 60 state, territorial and Canadian provincial associations, APA works to advance psychology as a science, as a profession and as a means of promoting health, education and human welfare.

Retrieved 12/14/11.  http://www.apa.org/releases

Advertisements
Leave a comment

9 Comments

  1. V

     /  12/15/2011

    This statement says essentially nothing. It is vague stuff that sounds sort of good. Sounds like the DSM-V is going to be a trainwreck.

    I saw you had a book chapter up and it went away? Have you considered talking to the media or doing any publicity?

    Like

    Reply
    • DSM a trainwreck? It became so when patients started to see it as the bible of psychiatry to lend legitimacy to their “illness”. Unfortunately, the psychiatric profession did nothing to educated these people about the DSM and to let them know it is nothing more than a book where clinicians can go to look up symptoms to get an idea of what may be wrong.

      It is now a book of power, politics, and deception.

      Like

      Reply
    • I was looking forward to reading the chapter, too. You’re keeping us in suspense!

      Like

      Reply
  2. Good article thanks for posting. It seems like you are urging your FMSwordF friends to send in their “empirical” evidence to support FMSword as a diagnosis. The reality is it isn’t a diagnosis and there is no empirical evidence that supports this. Rosie

    Like

    Reply
    • hi Rosie, Well duh, of course there is no evidence other than observations and personal stories… imagine if other medical illness were treated on such evidence?

      I don’t understand the FMSwordF? What does that mean? 🙂

      Like

      Reply
    • Rosie —
      Please consider some basic questions:
      What do you believe constitutes empirical evidence?
      Do you feel that recovered memory tales of ritual abuse should be accompanied by corroborative evidence before being accepted?
      Don’t you feel that Jeanette Bartha’s own personal narrative and other retractor reports constitute at least the same level of evidence put forward in defence of MPD/DID (that being a collection of similar self reports)?
      Do you feel traumatic reports of alien abduction or past life events are something other than false memories? Would you assert that these memories are true? Or are the subjects simply lying? Or is there something else going on.
      I don’t know what this “FMSwordF” thing is either. Please explain…

      Like

      Reply

What do you think?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s